Skip to main content

Jaws

On Saturday, Katie went to a girls-only social event. My initial plan involved working on manuscript review that is due this week. When the time rolled around, however, I felt more like a glass of scotch and a movie. After being ridiculed by Rachel in the comments of a prior post for not having seen Jaws, I decided to give that movie priority on my to-see list.

I greatly enjoyed the movie. It was well made. I particularly enjoyed the score by John Williams and how the Jaws theme "snuck up" in the music when the shark was stealthily approaching. My favorite bit of score was actually an eerie use of silence, when the shark made an dive carrying three buoys, which everyone thought would be impossible. The frightening realization that this was a powerful shark coincided with that eerie silence to great effect.

After finishing Jaws, I was surfing channels and doing a crossword puzzle while waiting for Katie to return from her unigender activities. I happened upon Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, which I reviewed for the MIT student newspaper a long time ago. That review, for whatever reason, is the most linked to (and thus probably the most read) piece of writing I've ever done. It has ended up on sites like this Internet Movie Database page.

I re-watched the scene where Jim Carrey sneaks into a secret location to find a large tank inhabited by a shark. He falls in, of course, and then is grabbed by the shark and dragged around the tank, half out of the water. I certainly didn't realize this at the time, but it was a clear parody on the opening scene in Jaws. What an odd coincidence that I happened upon that in my channel flipping right after seeing Jaws for the first time!

Comments

  1. I can't believe your college newspaper article from 1994 is on-line! I am also a little surprised that you wrote for the Arts section...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Always glad to be a good influence :). Now, this time of year is the perfect time to watch "It's a Wondeful Life." Hint, hint.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th