Skip to main content

Katie consents

A couple days before Christmas, Katie and I took our relationship to a new level. There's one particular nighttime activity that I find immensely pleasurable. I was always too bashful to ask Katie what I really wanted to do with her, though.

Why did I change my mind and finally ask Katie? I guess because we have been married for a year and a half now, and to tell the truth, our usual nighttime activities were getting a bit stale. (I knew that Katie agreed with me on that point, as we have openly talked about that part.) Also, I figured that Katie might be in a more generous mood since it's so close to Christmas.

I set the mood very carefully. I started by surprising Katie with a romantic home-cooked dinner when she got home from work. Then I steeled my nerves, swallowed the big lump in my throat, and tentatively propositioned her over the pork tenderloin.

She blushed mildly and smiled, pausing just a second or two before softly answering, "Yes."

It was truly incredible. Katie isn't as experienced as I am at this particular activity, but her enthusiasm was ineffable. And then at the end of it all, to my great surprise, she beat me. And quite soundly, I might add.

I kid you not. The final score was 344-321. (You knew I was talking about a game of Scrabble, right?)

Here's Katie agonizing over one of her late turns:

Here's the board at the end of the game:

Katie put the game away when she played QUIT, AI, and IT (in the upper right-hand corner), followed on the next turn by QOPH. (To those who care, AI is a three-toed sloth, and QOPH is a letter in the Hebrew alphabet. I did give Katie a bit of a handicap in that I shared all the stupid-yet-useful words in my brain that only come out when I play Scrabble; in particular, the two-letter words and the U-less Q words.) She scored over 50 points on each play, as the Q scored 40 points in QUIT and 30 points in QOPH. I had a brief rally, playing all my tiles with PLAITING on the next turn. (I discovered after searching with a Scrabble anagramming program that this was my highest scoring bingo. Go, me!) I wanted to play HILITING into the triple word score, but I didn't think that the misspelling was common enough yet to be a legal word. (It's not.) My final chance was when I held DRAINED on my last rack, with absolutely no place to play it. My only hope was to find a bingo that started with a vowel, which I could hook on the T or D. I couldn't find one. (I was shocked to find that there is none. Go, me!)

Here's the final score sheet, along with the primary word each of us played on each turn:

Here's Katie, pleasantly exhausted at the end of it all. (Don't believe her when she tells you that the exhaustion was not really all that pleasant):

I want also to point out that this blog post an homage to Katie's wedding vows, in which she both promised to learn a game of strategy with me and also delivered a line so dripping with innuendo that the entire congregation was tittering for a full minute. Heh.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th