Skip to main content

Writing for The Tech, part I

I wrote for the student newspaper when I was an undergrad at MIT. I joined because I thought it was a travesty for a school newspaper not to report on all of the arts events that the good student body was generating. I joined the newspaper for my senior year in order to rectify this situation. In my tenure, I covered a wide variety of MIT events:

Musical Theater Guild
Jesus Christ Superstar
Company
The Apple Tree
Guys and Dolls
West Side Story

Dramashop
The Winter's Tale
Six Characters in Search of an Author

Shakespeare Company
Romeo and Juliet

Gilbert & Sullivan Players
Pirates of Penzance

Chorallaries
Better Late Than Never
Concert in Bad Taste

Next Act
Kiss Me Kate

One Victor H. was a member of both the Chorallaries (an a capella vocal group) as well as Next Act (a musical show put on by one of the dorms). I didn't know Victor when we were both undergrads, but we ended up being in the same class in grad school at Berkeley and became good friends. It was in retrospective conversations that we discovered we had, in fact, interacted at MIT. He knew me well because I'd given him questionable reviews on two occasions. For the Next Act show, I recorded that although Victor had a nice singing voice, he was a horrible actor: he had the same vapid grin frozen on his face no matter emotion he was trying to portray. The "vapid grin" line apparently became a common jibe for his friends and acquaintances. Some even took a stack of newspapers, cut out a bunch of copies of the offending paragraph, and pasted them onto his dorm door in the shape of a smiley face with, of course, a vapid grin.

The funniest overlap, though, regards my review of the Bad Taste concert by Victor's beloved Chorallaries. The Bad Taste concert is an MIT tradition, held at midnight one day in March, where the stated goal is to be as offensive as possible. My review of the 1993 concert was that the singing was rather mediocre, though I thought the overall performance was quite funny. Apparently this hurt the feelings of the esteemed vocal group.

In 1994, I was serving as the editor of the Arts section. When the time for Bad Taste came around again, the Chorallaries sent Victor to go deal with The Tech. He came into the office and was pointed in my direction when he asked where the Arts editor was. He asked me in the traditional way that he would appreciate it if The Tech would review Bad Taste, promising the usual skip-to-the-front-of-the-line privileges. I assured him that we would send a reviewer. Then Victor tried to push his luck. He said that his group didn't really like last year's reviewer, thinking that the reviewer's comments were not very insightful. I pondered for a bemused moment whether I should reveal myself, but I held myself to a simple "okay."

Victor, however, noticed my slight hitch. The wheels started turning in his own head, and he did not like what they came up with. "You wrote last year's review, didn't you?"

"Yes," I replied. "Yes, I did."

Victor hesitated for a moment longer, wondering if he should say anything more. Eventually he decided that he had dug his hole deep enough and he sheepishly turned around to leave.

It would make a better story if I vengefully returned to excoriate the group more severely than the year before, but I refrained. I sent another reporter and left Victor feeling good about himself again.

It was quite funny when we realized later on in graduate school that we shared this connection. "That was YOU?!?" we each cried.

Comments

  1. Ah, Bad Taste 1993. Adrian and I remember it well; it was our first date!

    Menage a Troi: "I sense... sexual deprivation."

    MIT Barbie: "Math class is *easy*!"

    Benjamin Sisko character: "My wife was killed by multiple Borgasms."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had forgotten that was your first date! Too funny. Hard to believe that was 15 years ago, now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yoicks! I'd forgotten that that particular Bad Taste contained so many of the most memorable lines. And I'm pretty sure Jake sang "Cab Driver in New York". But no "Arise Ye Dead of MIT" (thanks, Tophe) or, erm, "Rub My Duckie"...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th