Skip to main content

Scrabble-playing Fool

Ekrem sent me email today with a link to an xkcd comic:



This comic reminded him of me, presumably not only because I'm a Scrabble nut (to the point where I have memorized all the legal two-letter words, but not yet to the point where I have memorized all the three-letter words), but also because my sense of humor tends to the Andy Kaufman-esque style of challenging propriety in conversation and other social interactions. I would be playing CLITORIS with great alacrity.

The comic has an additional clever bit in that if you mouse over the image on the xkcd web page, it delivers an additional note: "A veteran Scrabble player will spot the OSTRICH option." This is true, but while CLITORIS would score 64 points (including the double-letter scores and the bonus for playing all the tiles), OSTRICH would score a measly 10 points. That's unacceptable to a veteran Scrabble player.

Thankfully, our suffering protagonist actually has two other options that garner the 50-point bonus for playing all seven tiles: TROCHILS through the H, or COISTRIL through the I. (A trochil, of course, is the bird that cleans an alligator's teeth, while a coistril is a young lad employed by the esquire to carry the knight's heavy equipment around.) That's the way to score lots of points while avoiding embarrassment.

I'm guessing, however, that more people know what an ostrich is than a trochil or a coistril. The xkcd writer could still have engineered the joke so that while CLITORIS is the obvious play, a little more searching reveals another common 8-letter word. For example, if the board contained the word NOISE instead of HI, the same rack would produce CLOISTER and COLORIST in addition to CLITORIS. Of course, that might dilute the humor a bit for the sake of an arcane easter egg, but if xkcd wants to pander to the true Scrabble nuts, he should be more careful.

Comments

  1. Wait, you can't post a reference to the Wikipedia page for xkcd! That's just wrong.

    -Jan
    [Who can't spell urls today]

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was going to include the link back to the xkcd page, but for some reason I noticed at the last minute that the image itself was a hyperlink, and I though that it would direct back to that page. It was only then that I included the Wikipedia page, too. I have since dicscovered that the image links to the xkcd website, but only to the image itself there and not the home page. Thanks for correcting my deficiency!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th