Skip to main content

Conflicted Politics

In Minnesota, we're voting for one of our Senators as well as for President. It's comedian and liberal activist Al Franken against the incumbent Republican Norm Coleman. Lots of people have yard signs around our neighborhood (we're a swing state, after all). Most political yards have at least two signs, showing support either for both Obama/Biden and Franken or for both McCain/Palin and Coleman.

Because of the seniority rules in the Senate, it actually sometimes makes reasonable sense to vote across party lines for an incumbent Senator, and I know lots of people will cast simultaneous ballots for Obama and Coleman next month. I have been on the lookout for someone who has such party-conflicted yard signs. I have not yet found one, sadly. This disappoints me, but does make some sense: it's really the strong party faithful who are likely to go to the trouble of putting up yard signs. Democrats in the middle who might still vote for a Republican Senator are much less likely to have yard signs.

Katie and I were out driving over the weekend, though, and came across this yard, demonstrating an even more conflicted household:

I can imagine the conversation between husband and wife:

"We're both voting for Al Franken, right?"

"Are you crazy? He writes pornographic stories for Playboy magazine. I'm voting for Norm Coleman."

"What?!? Norm Coleman hates this state! He goes on fishing vacations in Alaska. You're an idiot if you're going to vote for him!"

"Well, you're clinically deranged if you're voting for Angry Al. And just for that, I'm going to order the biggest yard sign that Norm Coleman will give me!"

"Hah! Hah hah! Two can play at that game! Just wait until I get my yard sign from Al Franken!"

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:49 PM

    For about 60 years, my mother's parents voted faithfully in every election. Grandma always voted a straight Democratic ticket and Grandpa always voted straight Republican. I've often wondered if they ever tried to convince each other.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have seen cars with both bumper stickers too. If it were me, I would rather have a bare lawn/car than a schizophrenic one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:31 AM

    Does Norm Coleman really go on fishing vacations in Alaska? I can imagine that being just the kind of thing to get voters riled up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't know how true it is. It's part of one of Al Franken's attack ads (the attack ads in this Senate showdown have been downright brutal), which means that Norm Coleman probably took some trip to Alaska that involved some fishing or other fishing-like activity, but I highly doubt that he fishes exclusively in Alaska or anything like that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th