Skip to main content

Rebus Challenge 3

Here's the third installment of rebus puzzles I made in grade school. (Click for a larger version):
Check out Challenge #1 and Challenge #2 for an introduction to my oeuvre and for solving clues. My sister Missy had the first correct answer last time, while Grant provided the best surrealist answer (with my sister Tina between the two extremes). Post your answers in the comments section!

Comments

  1. Anonymous5:09 PM

    Deer mom, Eye kneed two go two the records at Novdefenestratedrock Presidential sum. Wood U take mi?

    SinseeDouglasfirrley,

    JMAndresen

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wigie11:14 AM

    Dear mom,

    I need to go to the library at
    November (12 or 24? Order or monetary denomination?). Would you take me?

    (garbled) (Sincerely?),

    JMAndresen

    -----------------
    Stag second, no talking trees,

    I patellad to traffic light to not be beneath the storm bathhouse capeau fairy-ta radioactive orb dead leaders. It's log, it's log, ut backscratche mi?

    Heathen Superman heat vision treerl, ey,

    JMAndresen
    ------------

    What kind of child sadist were you?

    ReplyDelete
  3. J. Michael Andresen1:49 PM

    Very nice! I thought that my crossing out of the ten commandments wouldn't so clearly be recognized as "sin" but Grant got it! And the probabilistic interpretation is that I wanted to go on November 24: given all the ways I could have gotten to 12, it seems unlikely that I would have chosen all presidents who happen to appear on dollar bills. (Challenge problem: calculate the p value for that hypothesis, if all presidential number sums to 12 are weighted equally.) I'm sad that my ember-belching fireplace was so opaque. "Defenstrated rock" and "radioactive orb" are good guesses. And while "it's log it's log" made me laugh, you're forgetting that the note was written some 25 years ago.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v
35 comments
Read more

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc
10 comments
Read more

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th
Post a Comment
Read more