Skip to main content

Beauty Leads to Intelligence


Grant posted a link reporting a study suggesting that patients feel more comfortable when doctors are dressed stereotypically.

I commented, "It's also true that pretty people are more intelligent. It turns out that if you have 'good genes' it gives you lots of advantages, including physical beauty, intelligence, disease resistance, and many others. (In other words, the same genes that regulate accurate production of a person's face also regulate accurate production of a person's brain.)"

Grant worried that studies that get at this correlation might be driven by rare but powerful outliers such as genetic syndromes that affect both craniofacial development and IQ. That is probably not the case because (a) those syndromes are astoundingly rare and (b) they would cause a potential subject from being admitted to a scientific study to begin with.

Here's a review and meta-analysis confirming this effect. It also points out that the earliest research in this field merely found that people were much better than expected at predicting the IQ of someone they'd never met from just looking at a picture of the stranger. The connection to attractiveness came later:

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, Vol. 28 No. 2, February 2002 238-249

A recently discovered and interesting related finding is that people are much better than chance at picking which of two candidates they've never seen won an election in some far-away place. That suggests that people are reacting at a gut level simply to how people look when making their votes. So people are good at picking out the more attractive candidates which correlates with intelligence and (I would strongly hope) with competence.

Science 10 June 2005: Vol. 308. no. 5728, pp. 1623 - 1626

Science 27 February 2009: Vol. 323. no. 5918, p. 1183

Grant himself has become quite beautiful since I knew him back in college. Here's a recent picture of himself that he posts on his blog:

Comments

  1. Anonymous2:08 PM

    Highly entertaining. I read the last Science letter you posted. Obama is a pretty good looking guy...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Especially compared to John McCain, which proves my point!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th