Skip to main content

Contest Winner(s): Name Those Tools!


I had a contest on Tuesday to Name Those Tools! The answers are embedded above. I thought that the nail set was the trickiest of the bunch.

My project last weekend was to put baseboards in the closet of our guest bedroom. For some completely bizarre reason, the previous owners did not see fit to put baseboards in the closet. (I have to trust Katie that this does, in fact, qualify as bizarre.) Here's our new baseboards, still needing to be painted:
The nail set, as Gloria pointed out, is for pounding nails below the surface of the wood so that they can be spackled over and then painted. I brought my nail set when I moved in with my lovely wife, and enjoyed stumping her as to the function of the tool. (That was the inspiration of the quiz!)

The hand plane was to make the tiny-yet-complicated piece of baseboard pictured below. Although it's only the size of an overgrown toothpick, it took 2 of the 8 hours I worked on the project to shape the wood so that it would fit into the allotted space:
The wire strippers were to put in a new light fixture, to replace the old one that didn't work:
And the winner is . . .
As for sending the promised prize to the winner, I am in a bit of a conundrum. Craig was the first person to identify the three tools correctly. (He answered nail punch instead of nail set, but that's an acceptable alternative.) That, truly, was the hard part. However, Craig did not answer the question. I asked What specific task were each of the three tools designed for? Craig needed to read the question more carefully! Normally I would have great sympathy for this, except that Craig is a college professor who sometimes complains about his complacent students.

I think Jan and Rachel deserve kudos for making additional creative guesses and hoping Craig was wrong, but it was Gloria who was the first to answer the actual contest question. It gets more complicated, though, because even Gloria did not include further description for what the wire strippers do, figuring that function is clearly indicated by the tool's name. I agree with her that the function of wire stripper is more clearly implied than hand plane or nail set. Craig might argue that the function is clearly implied in all three, though. Who deserves the prize?

After turning it over in my head, I decided the best thing would be to send prizes to Craig and Gloria. In the mail today went five bridge books for Gloria (to help in her quest for the national championship I have abandoned) and for Craig went a multi-CD set containing recordings of all of Mozart's known works. (I know that Craig likes Mozart, and better yet, Craig's husband Adrian is a professor of music composition who likes atonality and despises Mozart. I enjoy thinking of Adrian's ears bleeding as Craig plays everything Mozart ever wrote.)

Comments

  1. I am properly chastened, and yet overjoyed to have received generous partial credit. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would add that my father has always called the third tool a countersink, as Jan did; and I bet Jan would've said correctly that the pictured tool was used on nails rather than on screw holes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is why I asked for function rather than names! To me, a countersink (as you suggest) creates grooves for inserting a bolt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm, I think I must have just learned a different term for nail set. Or confused the name of the technique (countersink) for the name of the tool.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am honored to be the recipient of your bridge books. I will try to do you proud :)

    GNT final on 4/5! DC here I come :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:03 PM

    Ooa you should get into poker, WHAT?!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love watching poker on television, but I would be really bad at it because so little of the game is analytical. It's much more about being able to read your opponent, and I'm really bad at that!

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's a Sony eBook Reader! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sKBsp77PY0

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th