Skip to main content

Spam from the Ancient Phoenicians


Some months ago, I received this email:
Common Phoenician transportation was by means of ships. Most often Phoenicians would travel by sea on ships called galleys. Galleys ate large ships that can be used either for trade, travel or war. The Phoenicians were one of the first people to make and use galleys along with the Greeks. More than often galleys were used for transportation for trade between varios civilizations such as the Greeks, Syrians and many other civilizations.

Galleys were made from wood found in local regions in Phoenician territories. Galleys had large masts that had sails used to propel the galleys via wind power. They also included a set of oars on both sides o the ship so that oarsmen could row the ship when's winds were in unfavorable conditions. As time passed a many renovation to the galley occurred. Biremedes were introduced as an advancement on the original galley. The biremedes were a second row of oars to further increase the rowing capabilities of the galleys and increase the speed. And a later advancement was the trimede, which is three rows of oars for even more speed.

This information helps to illustrate the advancement of th Phoenician civilization.

Aj

It certainly appeared to be spam. I had no knowledge of the person sending it. It contained numerous misspellings. I was sent multiple copies of the same message. (It was sent to me three times over the course of an afternoon.) But there were no hyperlinks. Who would be sending me spam whose sole message was to tout the shipbuilding prowess of the ancient Phoenicians?

I recalled that my cousin Jillian had posted a Facebook update recently indicating that she was working on a school project involving various peoples of the ancient Mediterranean. She had drawn the Phoenicians. Was it possible that this email was intended for her? Her email address is the same as mine with a single digit appended at the end. Could my Phoenician spam have been intended for her inbox? I wrote her an email to find out:

This is quite hilarious, but I think I have deduced that this email must have been meant for you. I remember you saying in a Facebook update some time ago that you are doing a school project on the Phoenicians. Add in the fact that it really doesn't look like a spam message and that your gmail address is very close to mine (I'm sure you're jealous that I got jmandresen with no number as my username), and I bet this was intended for you.

Was I right? Or do you not know an AJ?

Your cousin,

Josh Michael

Her response:

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Oh my goodness that was for me! He said he sent it multiple times (no wonder it didn't get to me for a while!) You have quite a good memory for remembering I was doing a project on the Phoenicians... haha but yes, I was bummed I had to add the number to my email, and now I know who stole the base 'jmandresen' from me is! But really that is quite hilarious, and yes AJ was one of my group members! haha this just made my morning!

Your cousin,

Jillian

Comments

  1. That was super funny! I'm glad I looked it up! Although I am jealous that Jillian got in your blog!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th