Skip to main content

The Logical Appeal of Vegetarianism


This is the image on a new billboard that was put up over the weekend on my route to work.

My first reaction was to note that there are very obvious reasons for why our neolithic forebears domesticated chickens to eat and cats to kill rodents rather than the other way around.

That is beside the point for the ad campaign, though. The billboard's message is that we should treat chickens with the same respect as we treat cats because they are equally cute.

I finally had to concede that ad campaign raises a very good point. Changes should be made. Although my current pet cat has been spayed, a quick trip to the nearest alley with a can of tuna fish should allow me to collect enough individuals to start a breeding program. My goal will be to create a strain of fat felines with nicely marbled meat that is more suitable for human consumption.

Comments

  1. Anonymous1:03 PM

    Michael, surely you're aware that the chicken was not domesticated by _your_ forebears (unless you are of pale Indian stock), that cats were most likely domesticated during the mesolthic era rather than the neolithic, and that -- regardless when they were domesticated -- cats have been eaten as food throughout human history (e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat)?

    ReplyDelete
  2. J. Michael Andresen1:32 PM

    Dear Anonymous:

    My sources (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_animals) suggest the neolithic.

    Regarding the fact that people through history have eaten cats, I am not sure I follow your logic. Would you claim that maize was domesticated for the purpose of placing inside dried gourd shells to make maracas?

    ReplyDelete
  3. J-W Maessen4:59 PM

    Me, I just think predators mostly make for bad eatin'.

    Except predatory fish. Them's tasty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:02 PM

    It is almost certain that the majority of humans have at least one ancestor involved in the domestication of the red jungle fowl.

    It is also likely that the domestication of the cat was actually a self-domestication, making talking about the "purpose" of their domestication even more fraught with peril than most discussions of teleology.

    The problem, I believe, with your plan, Dr. Andresen, is that while chickens are of value both as broilers and as egg layers, feline eggs make for poor eating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v
35 comments
Read more

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc
10 comments
Read more

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th
Post a Comment
Read more