Skip to main content

2010 Prognostication Quiz: Post #3 (Football)


The New Orleans Saints defeated the Indianapolis Colts in a thrilling game that became the most-watched television program of all time: its 106.5 million viewers beat out the 106 million that watched the last episode of M*A*S*H in 1983. (Is this foreshadowing that one of the two cast members on our death watch will also fall soon?)

Ten percent of the entrants guessed that The Saints would come marching in:
Ryan
Beth K.
Mary C.
Zhiqi
Valerie

Leader Board

Ryan has now answered the first three questions correct to jump out to an early lead over the rest of the field. Nipping at his heels are Beth K. and Topher, each with two points:

3 Ryan
2 Beth K.
2 Topher
1 Rachel H.
1 Mary C.
1 Zhiqi
1 Marcus
1 Pamela
1 Cameron
1 Stephanie
1 Valerie
1 Beth Z.
1 Larry
1 Eric
1 Craig
1 Ron
1 Adrian
1 Polly
1 Nad
1 Janet
1 Keila
1 Peter
1 Gloria
1 Cherie
1 Missy
1 Janette
0 Diane
0 Ekrem
0 Jan
0 Megan
0 Mike F.
0 Liz
0 Kevin
0 Leanne
0 Tina
0 Matthew
0 Rich
0 Mary A.
0 Grant
0 Todd
0 Russell
0 Christopher T.
0 Michael A,
0 Zoe
0 Sarah
0 Carol
0 Ben
0 Rachel F.
0 Ellen
0 Katie
0 Chris C.
0 Peter II
0 Jeff

Last year, Tina started 3-for-3, but then she got the hubris and only got one of the final 11 questions correct. In 2008, Grant and Ekrem both answered two of the first three correctly and finished with two more of the last ten to finish strong, but out of the top quintile. How will Ryan fare this year? Will he get the hubris and irritate the gods? Or can he maintain some humility and continue to prosper?

Question 4 Update:
The Oscar race still seems to be a toss-up between A. Avatar and B. The Hurt Locker. If Avatar wins, Eric, Cherie, and Janette will advance to the tie for second place with two points, one behind Ryan. If The Hurt Locker prevails, Craig, Ron, Nad, and Janet will advance to two points, but Ryan would take an unprecedented two-point lead over everyone else in the field.

Comments

  1. This contest is stupid. I don't want to play anymore. Plus, it's degrading to women and children; and it's run by a person of questionable ethics.

    Of course, I reserve the right to change my opinion should I end up winning. :-)

    -Tina

    ReplyDelete
  2. !!!!!!!!!!!!TINA YOU ARE FUMNY!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You make hubris sound like an STD.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would say more that it's degrading to old people, but certainly I pull no punches when it comes to women and children, either.

    Jan, the defensive nature of your comment makes it sound like YOU have the hubris. Be sure to tell your wife.

    ReplyDelete
  5. YOU ARE ALL ANTS AND I SHALL SQUASH YOU BENEATH THE UNSTOPPABLE FORCE OF MY MOSTLY RANDOM ZIG-ZAG ANSWER PATTERN!!!! (maniacal hubris-filled laugh)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I totally thought Peyton was going to come through for me. . . bummer. - liz

    ReplyDelete
  7. I guess that answers the question about whether Ryan has the hubris or not. I prognosticate zero for the final twelve questions for Ryan.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th