Skip to main content

Shootout at the Kresge Auditorium

I played trombone starting in 5th grade and going through college. At the end of college, I started getting into percussion, as well. I played timpani for a Gilbert and Sullivan show and also played some with the MIT symphony, which gave its concerts in Kresge Auditorium.

The pinnacle of my percussion career came when the percussion section got mentioned specifically in a music review in the Boston Globe. The MIT symphony doesn't always get reviewed in the Globe, but we had a semi-famous soloist (also the wife of an MIT faculty member) playing with us, so we had a reviewer for this one show:
The piece in question was Aaron Copland's "Billy the Kid Suite." At one point, a gun fight takes place in the music: a duet between the bass drum (me) and timpani (my pal Kip). During rehearsals, we kept trying to outdo the other. The original music calls for normal volume, and that's how we started, with me using the soft felt mallet usually used for the bass drum. I decided that the bass drum should be louder than the timpani, though, so I kept increasing volume, gradually hitting the drum harder over the series of rehearsals. Kip, not to be outdone, kept making himself louder, too. I switched to a hard felt mallet so I could make even more noise out of the drum. Kip changed mallets as well. I couldn't keep up, so I switched to a wooden mallet, only very rarely used for bass drum. At some point during one rehearsal, the director finally realized what was going on, noticing how deafening we had (somewhat sneakily) become. Happily for us, he rather liked the effect and allowed us to keep what was a very non-standard interpretation of the music.

At the performance, we were dazzling. The lead-in to the gunfight features very soft chords in the strings and then, from nowhere:
WHAM!
WHAM!
WHAM-WHAM-WHAM!

The audience actually gasped! It was a great effect, and highly musically appropriate as well (it's a gunfight, after all). The review focused on the famous soloist. Here's what he had to say about the Copland:
There were lots of important percussion parts in the piece, but I like to think he was referring most of all to the gunfight duet with Kip and me that completely shocked the unassuming audience when the guns began shooting.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:55 PM

    I can totally picture you and Kip. Hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, that was a fun concert. I've lost touch with Kip, though a web search seems to imply that he's a diligent physicist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:39 PM

    Yes, I don't know how diligent he is, but definitely a physicist. I hear he's still hitting timpani a little too loud in a number of ensembles!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th