Skip to main content

The Palin Phenomenon

Katie and I read different magazines. For news, Katie reads Time while I read The Economist. It is common in our household to swap articles that we think the other will find particularly interesting. Amusingly, the last articles we swapped were each editorials on Sarah Palin, this one from Time and this one from The Economist.

The first article (in Time) suggests that the reason the Republicans have pulled even in the polls is Palin's abililty to propagate the myth of idyllic small-town America. It is a well understood psychological phenomenon that good memories from the past are much better remembered than bad memories. Perhaps this explains voters' irrational obsession with mental images of the good times of yore that never really existed. According to this mythology, McCain and Palin are trying to restore all the good things from the past that people remember inaccurately. Obama isn't able to do so much along those lines. Will the incumbent party be able to overcome the huge mess of a pyramid scheme that our financial system has become? It will be interesting to see if the mythology wins over that.

The second article (in The Economist) talks about Palin's vice-presidential run and Clinton's almost-presidential run and suggests that while gender-based hatred is still prevalent (one anti-Hillary lobbyist started a group called Citizens United Not Timid), some indicators suggest that women are actually proving their superiority to men on a population-wide scale. My favorite interesting tidbit is that women earn 57% of the bachelor's degrees in the U.S. That just astounds me, especially in the modern U.S. economy which pays such a premium for post-secondary education. Are men really so stupid? (Respect the rhetorical nature of that question, please!)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th