Skip to main content

Katie's Foggy Memory

When we got home on Sunday night, we were beat from the weekend, so we decided to relax in front of a movie. Katie had recently decided she wanted to see the third X-Men movie. I had already seen it, but I dutifully ordered it fron Netflix, figuring I wouldn't mind seeing it again for Katie's enjoyment.

My doubts as to whether Katie has really not seen it before started about 30 seconds into the opening battle scene, when Katie correctly predicted, "Is this in a simulator?" Later, when Kelsey Grammer appeared on screen as the cerulean-skinned Beast, she asked, "Was he in the previous X-Men movie?" He wasn't, of course, which confirmed that Katie had already seen this movie, too.

The next thing to figure out was whether I had, in fact, watched the movie with Katie. It was released in 2006, so we might have seen it while we were dating. The X-Men movies (like the comics before them) are set in a world of normal humans living alongside mutants with a variety of unique extra powers. One scene from the third movie involves a cure for mutanthood, giving each mutant the chance to renounce their mutant power and become human.

It was at this point that I realized that I had, in fact, seen the movie with Katie, as I recalled discussing this scene with her in light of a conversation I once had with a gay friend of mine. My friend told me that some people in the gay community discuss what they would do if a pill existed that would make them instantly straight. It hardly needs stating that there is nothing wrong with being gay, but even so, living with discrimination is difficult and often unpleasant. My friend said he would take the pill with great alacrity and no qualms if it were available to him.

That was the essence of the conversation that I had with Katie two years ago as we watched the film. I wondered if she would remember the conversation. She did, but in a somewhat hazy manner. When the scene came up where some mutants lined up to take the cure while other mutants protested the mere existence of the cure, Katie queried, "What is this like? Is this like being gay?"

My memory is often quite foggy as well, but it's more entertaining when it happens to someone else.

Comments

  1. That's awesome! You've hit an important "couples" milestone -- you've been together long enough that you have forgotten memories together, awwww. :) (Of course 2006 isn't that long ago ... )

    ReplyDelete
  2. Katie and I had a good laugh over being called out for being so hopeless as to have mutual amnesia for events just two years ago. (To our credit, it was more like two years and 4 months.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th