Skip to main content

Book Report: Robinson Crusoe

Rachel's comment on my post about my reading list made me feel very narrow-minded to focus so exclusively on 20th century novels written in English. Jane Austen wrote some nice stories, after all (or so Rachel tells me). I have thus attempted a new method of coming up with a good reading list that will keep me busy in my new bridge-free (and Katie-ful) life. I am still working on the list (I'll share it eventually), but I have already started reading books from it.

I've also decided to blog book reports about the books I'm reading. I delight in lots of things as I read, and I think some of them might be interesting to a general readership. I'm going to try to avoid being very didactic. (I might have gone a bit overboard in talking about my recent art viewing expidition, for example.)

Robinson Crusoe was written by Daniel Defoe in 1719. The book is heralded by some scholars as the very first novel ever written, but that seems subject to much debate and does not greatly interest me. I just like reading good stories.

I found the book quite enjoyable with the one caveat of needing to get over Defoe's prose style. He is fond of incredibly long and agonizingly convoluted sentences replete with dependent clauses. Here's a very typical sentence (at the start of chapter two):

That evil influence which carried me first away from my father's house - which hurried me into the wild and indigested notion of raising my fortune, and that impressed those conceits so forcibly upon me as to make me deaf to all good advice, and to the entreaties and even the commands of my father - I say, the same influence, whatever it was, presented the most unfortunate of all enterprises to my view; and I went on board a vessel bound to the coast of Africa; or, as our sailors vulgarly called it, a voyage to Guinea.

The prose style was very distracting to me at first, but I became quickly inured. And I still think it's much more readable than your typical Shakespeare play.

The bulk of this adventure story is how poor Robin Crusoe is shipwrecked on a desert island and how he survives by his wits and cleverness for eight-and-twenty [sic] years. His struggles include not only being able to provide enough food and shelter for himself, but also to prevent himself from going mad (which plays out in internal struggles regarding fate and the nature of Providence). These two themes provide quite engrossing tension that drives the narrative.

I have moved from Robinson Crusoe to E. M. Forster's A Room with a View (1909). I'm only on chapter two, but it appears to be about two women from England vacationing in Italy. One of the two women is walking through Florence with another female companion when they take a wrong turn. "What are we to do?" decries one. "Two lone females in an unknown town. Now, this is what I call an adventure." The stark contrast (from Crusoe's 28-year-long adventure trying to survive on his island) caused me great mirth.

Comments

  1. Woo! I influenced someone! Thank goodness it was about books, and not about conquering the world :). I'll be interested in your methodology and your new list ...

    I've never read Crusoe ... but now I think I might. Sounds like a good read!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th