Skip to main content

O'Keefe and Kahlo

Katie and I went yesterday to see two art exhibitions by prominent 20th century woman artists: Georgia O'Keeffe (at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts) and Frida Kahlo (at the Walker Art Center). We went to both exhibits with Beth Z. and Heather M. and then returned home for pizza and discussion.

The O'Keeffe exhibit was my favorite of the two. I was especially fond of the "pelvis series" paintings in the collection, which typically depict a blue sky framed by a cow pelvis in the foreground. My favorite O'Keeffe painting from yesterday was Pelvis IV (1944):




O'Keeffe meant to contrast the eternity of the blue sky (with moon in this instance of the series) with the ephemeral nature of life on earth. O'Keeffe may have had World War II on her mind as she painted, but the sobering contrast is just as relevant today as we destroy our planet with greenhouse gases.

At first glance, the abstraction in the piece is subtle. She provides enough shading to make clear the pelvis is a physical object, yet the contrast between background and foreground is not quite realistic. Standing in front of the painting, the blue sky that starts in the background at the initial viewing flips to become an abstract splotch of blue in the middle of a white background. This is emphasized by the painting's texture, sadly not visible in the picture. While the sky and the shading in the pelvis are brushed in, O'Keeffe used a palette knife to spread the white paint thickly around the edges of the canvas. This enhances the confusion between foreground and background and gives the piece its wonderful and subtle abstract contrast.

Frida Kahlo stands in rather stark contrast to O'Keeffe's subtle abstract paintings. Kahlo's surrealist paintings are shocking and evocative. Although famous for her self-portraits (90% of the paintings in the exhibit were this), my favorite painting was a commission, The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939):



The painting depicts the suicide of Ms. Hale, a member of high society in New York who became despondent and leaped to her death. It was commissioned by the socialite's mother (who was so horrified upon seeing the painting that she threatened to destroy it). It is rather graphic, depicting both the horror of the fall and the bloody denouement. Very chilling and quite powerful. So powerful, in fact, that the frame could not adequately contain the painting, serving instead as a continuation of the canvas.

Comments

  1. Thanks for posting these -- I had been wanting to get to those exhibits and now feel like I got a taste of them from my office! Best, Liz

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th