Skip to main content

Katie and the Geezer

First, some wedding photos! (No, I am not the geezer. The geezer appears later in the post. Katie is, in fact, four months older than I am.)

Here's one of the happy couple:

Here's one with the wedding parties and immediate families in front of the waterfall that was immediately opposite the reception site:
This one is a favorite of ours. While traipsing about in the grass, a number of small insects had gotten caught in the sheer netting of Katie's dress. We realized this after the posed photos were done and it was a group effort to remove them all as quickly and efficiently as possible:

And now back to our regularly scheduled post.

Katie and I went to see the musical Chicago last weekend. We arrived at the Ordway Theater about 40 minutes before curtain so that we could share a pre-show cocktail before sitting down. That meant that we went to find our seats just five minutes before the lights went down. I led Katie ahead of me as we wended our way to the seats in the middle of the row. As Katie was sitting down, the elderly gentleman sitting next to her said something. I was too far away to hear clearly. I found out later that he said to Katie, "I was hoping it would be you sitting next to me."

A bit incredulous, Katie smiled awkwardly and sat down. The man kept staring at her. Feeling his stare, perhaps, Katie looked over at him again. He held out his hand to her. "Do you want to hold hands?" he queried.

I heard that one clearly, so I had to protect my interests. "Hey!" I shouted, grabbing Katie's hands. "She's my wife!"

He turned his gaze on me. "How old do you think I am?" he asked. Trying to be incredibly generous, I suggested "Sixty?"

"I'm ninety-three!" he retorted. He reached out to me to shake hands. Although he had just insulted my wife, I felt sorry for him that he was so old. Life can be so cruel to people sometimes. And maybe his behavior had been considered appropriate back when he was a teenager (during the Great Depression). So, I congenially reached out to shake his hand.

He had a remarkably firm grip, I thought, for a 93-year-old. Then he started squeezing harder, and then harder. I looked at him quizzically. His return gaze was phlegmatic. "I could take you, you know" he stated mildly.

By this point, everyone within an arm's reach of either of us was laughing hysterically. "I'd like to see you try!" I retorted. As if in answer to an implied question, he explained: "I have mafia connections."

Still holding my hand (he wouldn't let go!) he asked me what I did for a living. I explained that I am a biologist doing research at the University of Minnesota. He thought about that for a second, then made an honest mistake: "I remember you! You gave me a bad grade back in '33." Now disgusted with me, he finally let go of my hand, pushing it away forcefully.

The conversation continued, with the Geezer asking Katie what she did. Katie said she was a lawyer. By this point, everyone around us was feeling rather friendly, and a man sitting in the row in front of us turned around to ask her, "Why is it that you attorneys are always practicing law without ever getting it right?" (Everyone's a comedian, I guess.)

We found out that the Geezer was there with his daughter and son-in-law (both in their mid-sixties, apparently). During intermission we overheard them talking with the Geezer about the show. He complained that he didn't understand what was going on, but he didn't seem surprised or upset at that fact. I got the picture that it happened with some regularity. His daughter asked if he wanted them to explain to him what was happening. He stubbornly refused, as if to suggest that it wouldn't do any good.

Later on, he made a few more jokes toward Katie and me along the same lines of "I-may-be-lecherous-but-only-in-a-harmless-and-amusing-manner-because-I-am-old-enough-to-have-voted-for-FDR" including one more time trying to hold Katie's hand. He had overstayed his welcome by that point, though. The humor had worn thin, and we didn't have much more to say to him.

We mused on the way home that he really was able to get away with some obnoxious behavior due to his age. The whole affair wouldn't have been nearly as funny if he'd been, say, fifty. I wonder if he ever gets the cute young girl to hold hands with him. I'd bet he does!

Comments

  1. Finally, some pictures! :) How wacky is the "mafia" guy?? Makes me think of the Sopranos.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th