Skip to main content

My house is for sale!

In advance of my nuptials, I need to divest myself of some real estate. It's a bit sad that I moved to Minnesota and needed to buy my house at the same time the Federal Reserve dropped the prime lending rate to 1% to battle inflation and unemployment. The very low interest rates tempted the banking industry to experiment with an idea they thought might make them money in the circumstances: extend mortgage credit to sub-prime borrowers. Banks thought they could charge interest rates high enough to cover the probable default rate for borrowers with poor credit ratings. These poor credit risks were out there buying houses when I was buying mine, pushing up demand and pushing up prices with it.

The great banking experiment failed miserably. The banks had greatly miscalculated. The banking industry is awash with defaulted loans, and the housing industry is awash with foreclosures. This is a doubly bad situation for me now, since (a) the demand for houses had dropped drastically since the banking industry is no longer floating sub-prime mortgages and (b) the supply of houses has greatly increased since the banks have to all their foreclosed properties on the market. The lower demand and higher supply both work to depress the price. Minnesota did a bit better than other parts of the country, with housing staying about even in value from 2005 to 2006. This year, however, things have taken a downturn. Houses in the Twin Cities area are selling for 4% less than they were a year ago. Accordingly, I've just listed my house at 4% less than I bought it for:

http://www.edinarealty.com/Listing/ListingDetail.aspx?Listing=21577092

If anyone wants to buy a house in this buyers' market, this house is for sale across the street from Katie and me:

http://www.edinarealty.com/Listing/ListingSearchResults.aspx?Search=b8ecf86d-0a94-4a0e-b050-761ea456b662

It's a nice neighborhood! Someone should move next to us! We'd invite you over for dinner a lot!

Comments

  1. Anonymous9:07 PM

    It is a great neighborhood! But the house across the street is poorly remodeled. That said, I guess we wouldn't be living there.

    There is another house down the street that is more stylish. (And a bit less $.) Also, 2 ramblers nearby I'm dying to tear down. Want to live there in the meantime?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v
35 comments
Read more

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc
10 comments
Read more

2017 Prognostication Quiz FINAL POST: Questions 10 and 11, Stocks and Quakes

In the last post , I pointed out that Matthew D. and I were in a two-way tie at the top of the leaderboard with me holding the edge over him in the tiebreaker. For Matthew D. to have a chance to come from behind and grab the win, some significant December movement would be needed in one of three areas: the stock market, world earthquakes, or a convenient death. Here's what happened: 10. Stocks (December 29) How will stocks do in this first year of Trumponomics? Will the Dow Jones Industrial Average be up or down compared to the final close of 2016? Which way will the Dow go? a. Up b. Down The Dow Jones continued to rise throughout the month. I maintained my advantage in the tie-breaker. 11. Earthquake (December 31) How many big earthquakes (magnitude 8.0 or larger on the Richter scale) will there be this year? (Big earthquake counts from this millennium are indicated in parentheses.) How many big earthquakes will there be this year? a. None (2) b. One (7) c. Two (4) d. Th
Post a Comment
Read more