Skip to main content

Katie and the City

Katie and I had a disagreement last night about which character from Sex and the City she most resembles. She thinks she looks most like Kim Cattrall, while I think she more closely resembles Sarah Jessica Parker. Please let us know in the comments who you think is correct!

Here's Sarah Jessica Parker:
Here's Katie:
Here's Kim Cattrall:

Comments

  1. Anonymous2:14 PM

    Hmmm, hard to tell. I am leaning toward Kim, but I would need to see a picture of Kim smiling and showing her teeth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:27 PM

    Hands down, Katie looks like Kim Cattrall rather than Sarah. --Stacey

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:12 PM

    I'm not going to touch that one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:17 PM

    It's a hard call but I lean toward Kim Catrell. They have the same face shape. Although Katie's beauty may be distracting me from seeing things clearly.
    --Eric

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10:16 PM

    This is clearly a false dilemma. Both Katie and Michael are trying to distract all of us from the clear resemblance Cynthia Nixon. See Picture 1 and Picture 2 for documentary evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous11:31 PM

    Kim, of course! And since Katie and I enjoy identifying famous duos that we resemble (e.g., Betty and Veronica, Mary Ann and Ginger), I would definitely be the brunette on the show (but since I only recently acquired cable, I have no idea what her name is).

    ReplyDelete
  7. Katie9:28 AM

    I was going to say that it’s embarrassing how into me Michael is. Now it seems he is not alone.

    ReplyDelete
  8. MT9:32 AM

    I think that Katie resembles Sarah more in these two photos, but agree with CHristy that the lack of smile on Kim's photo may be throwing me off.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can You Cross Your Toes?

Katie and I had a heated discussion the night before last. We were sitting on the couch watching Jon Stewart when she noticed a large, apparently cancerous growth sticking out of the bottom of my foot. She asked what the big lump in my sock was. "That's my toe," I responded, nonplussed. I had crossed my first and second toes, causing a lump to protrude from the bottom of my sock. Katie was quite alarmed. "You can cross your toes?" "Sure, can't you? Everyone can cross their toes!" "Of course I can't cross my toes. Who can cross their toes?" And I confirmed that Katie could not, in fact, cross her toes. Even manipulating her toes with my fingers, I could not get her toes to stay crossed. She just has very short toes. That led, of course, into a discussion of who was the freak. Were my long, crossable toes abnormal, or were her stubby, uncrossable phalanges the outliers? In case you're confused, here are some pictures. First, of my v...
37 comments
Read more

Leagalize drugs!

The Economist has a wonderful editorial this week about legalizing drugs. I wholeheartedly agree that the world will be better off by far if the United States legalized, taxed, and regulated illicit drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, and heroin. The goods that will come from legalization: 1. We will save the $40 billion the US spends trying to eliminate the supply of drugs. 2. We will save the costs involved in incarcerating so many drug offenders (as well as gain their productivity in society). 3. We will gain money through taxation on the legal drug trade. 4. Legalized drugs will be regulated, and thus purer and safer to take. 5. With all these savings, we will have lots of money to spend on treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than as a law and order issue. We will have lots of money to fund treatment programs for addicts that are ensnared by the easier availability of drugs. 6. We will prevent tens of thousands of killings in countries that produce drugs when proc...
10 comments
Read more

2016 PROGNOSTICATION QUIZ

Entry deadline is 3:30 p.m. CST on  Saturday, January 16, 2016 . Send fifteen answers and one tie-break to jmandresen at gmail.com. Anyone with an email address is welcome to enter! 1. Freedom (January) Freedom House is an international organization that studies democracy and freedom in the world, publishing an annual report on how many countries it calculates to be free, partly free, or not free. The 2015 report calculated that 89 of the world’s 195 nations were free in 2014. Will freedom advance, stay stagnant, or retreat in this year’s report, covering 2014? Note: the nine  worst  free countries (with the highest likelihood of being downgraded) are Botswana, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guyana, India, Jamaica, Lesotho, Montenegro, and Peru. The fifteen  best  partly free countries (with the highest likelihood of being upgraded) are Albania, Bolivia, Ecuador, Georgia, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Paraguay, Philippines, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, ...
2 comments
Read more